I’ve been reviewing coverage of the Climate Change Summit that occurred this past week in the outskirts of Cochabamba, Bolivia, and was simultaneously encouraged and depressed.
Encouraged that some 20,000 people from all walks of life would show up from at least 100 countries to strategize approaches to mitigate what they see as a pending crisis of unprecedented proportions. Depressed that the U.S. media for the most part ignored it. Had it not been for the comic relief from a mistranslated and misunderstood remark Bolivian President Evo Morales made about hormone-filled industrially produced chicken, there may have been no coverage at all in most of the U.S. media. Which is a shame, because the U.S. above all countries needs to be a part of this very serious global dialog. (“Chicken causes baldness and homosexuality”)
Cochabamba, which a decade ago fought and won a battle against the Bechtel Corporation over the privatization of its water supply, has become a symbol of the anti-corporate globalization movement worldwide, and more recently, a symbol of the gathering movement to forestall a global climate change crisis.
Climate change is more than a theory and is definitely no hoax for Bolivians, who have seen their millenia-old glaciers shrink to half their size in the past 50 years. Those glaciers are not just scenery; they provide the water supply for the country’s two largest cities, nearly a quarter of the population. Bolivian President Evo Morales pointed out the irony that sharpens the sense of injustice around this fact: Bolivia, like most of the world’s poorest countries, had little to do with the increased levels of carbon in the atmosphere that scientists blame for the steadily increasing temperatures.
Like the farmers in Africa and Mexico and elsewhere who are seeing their crop yields dwindle, like the residents of Bangladesh, the Maldives and other coastal or island nations who are seeing their shores being eaten away by increased flooding and rising tides, those who stand to lose the most from climate change are those who have benefited the least from the industrialization that is believed to be causing it. Experts predict, in fact, that up to 75% of the effects of climate change will be felt by developing countries. This may be why the industrialized countries are paying so little attention, and why so many people, mostly in the U.S., can continue to believe it’s a hoax, despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary.
That’s why Morales decided to host this alternative conference at the closing of the Copenhagen climate talks in December. The idea was to give those who were marginalized or excluded from the debate in Copenhagen the opportunity to strategize and develop a plan in preparation for the next round of talks, to be held in Cancun, Mexico, this November.
Last year Bolivia passed a bill of rights for the Madre Tierra, Mother Earth, in his own country, and now with Cochabamba, Morales is leading the call to establish something similar for the world. He is also calling for a Climate Justice Tribunal that would acknowledge the imbalance that is currently playing out and would require industrialized countries to offer not charity, not financial aid, to the developing countries being affected by climate change, but mitigation efforts for the consequences of their actions.
These are serious issues, and Morales is far from alone in calling for these changes. So it’s dismaying to see that the New York Times and Washington Post dedicated just a few paragraphs this week to the event – both of them from the Associated Press. One short story mocked Morales for suggesting that consuming hormone-tainted industrial chicken might affect male reproductive organs, a fact that is backed by scientific research on the subject. The remark, unfortunately, was mistranslated to mean that the hormones make men gay – a comment that has been gleefully picked up and tossed about throughout the blogosphere ever since. The climate summit was mentioned in the AP story only as an “environmental conference.” The other, a three-paragraph brief, mentioned in similarly mocking tones that Morales was establishing a “Mother Earth Ministry” and calling for a climate justice court.
CNN, unfortunately, didn’t consider the issue worth its time at all.
Time Magazine, on the other hand, presented a balanced and thoughtful article: “Bolivia’s Morales: Eating Chicken Makes You Gay?”
I forgave the silly and misleading title – perhaps it will draw a few more readers, which is all to the good.
The most comprehensive coverage comes from Amy Goodman on Democracy Now, whose crew reported from the conference for the duration. Stories, videos and podcasts can be seen, heard and downloaded at www.democracynow.org.
(Cochabamba photo courtesy of Wikepedia Commons)



















